The EVERFLOW

WARNING! LONG POST BUT WORTH IT!



Okey guys! I must tell you guys what happened the other night. I’m still laughing at it.

Do you guys remember my hunt for the Raspberry & Peach flavored Celsius drink? The one i had in Bulgaria and been on constant hunt of since i came back home to Sweden?


Well, the other day I went to heaven. I found a big big stash at a store so ofcourse i snagged 36 cans of them. Yes. I am serious.

Me when I saw them; *goes directly to them*
My brain; Mii, you don’t need more!
Me; shush, its limited edition!
Brain; fair point. GRAB THEM ALL!
Me; say no more!
Me; ding! Paid for them.
Bankaccount; Mii, we need to talk.
Me; ssssh, we do not.
Brain; ok we have 36 more. I think we are safe.
Me; limited edition! What if I run out?!
Brain; oh god.

I actually was planning to go to the store the day after to buy more. Imagine the scenario;

🛒 The store:
Store: We have Raspberry & Peach for 2 for 25 kr!
Mima: I know. I have been here.
Store: There is still pretty many left.
Mima: Not for long, darling 💅🏼
Store: How many do you want?
Mima: Shhhhhh 🤫


HEY, atleast I’m trying to save the soldiers!
•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°



WELL, the other night I was putting my stash away and counted the cans i have in total of every energy drinks I have. While stashing i accidentally opened one and here is where the craziness starts that makes me laugh.



I texted my best friend and here is a small part of our conversation.

So ofcourse, my brain went crazy so I actually asked chatgpt for help. I wanted a case for it. A murder case so here we go. Enjoy reading it. Hahaha!

He was a brave Viking! Took one for the team!
•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°

Here comes the longest part but worth it 😂

Wanted poster #1

•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°

•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°




THE PEOPLE v. MIMA
The Raspberry & Peach Murder Trial
A true-crime-inspired comedy case file.
Case No. 0067-RP
Location: The Beverage Warehouse
Defendant: Mima, the Horrible Warehouse Leader
Victim: One innocent Celsius Sparkling Raspberry Peach
Status: Case closed. The surviving beverages remain traumatised.
One can. Sixty-six survivors. Zero competent warehouse management.

───

PART I — HOW IT ALL BEGAN
It was supposed to be an ordinary day.
Mima had finally organised her energy drink collection into one storage box. Her precious collection included Celsius, Reign Storm and one Pro Brands can.
The inventory was as follows:
• 10 Reign Storm cans.
• 10 assorted Celsius flavours.
• 1 Pro Brands can.
• 46 Celsius Raspberry & Peach cans were intended to be in the collection.
Total: 67 cans.
Everything was going according to plan.
Until the stacking incident.
During the organisation of the cans, the bottom of one Raspberry & Peach can became caught on the pull tab of the can underneath it. The unfortunate entanglement caused a puncture, followed by an audible hiss.
One can was no longer intact.
The final inventory stood at 66 cans, including 45 intact Raspberry & Peach cans.
A warehouse accident had occurred.
But Mima did not simply report the incident.
She turned it into a military memorial.

───

PART II — THE TEXT MESSAGES
Exhibit A: The Inventory Announcement
Mima informed her best friend that she had finally organised her energy drink stash.
Mima:
“🥹 jag har stashat mitt lager med energydrinks”
Translation: “I’ve stocked my energy drink stash.”
Best Friend:
“Wooh”
“Vill ha en stash av celsiusen jag gillar 😂 men nääää”
Translation: “I want a stash of the Celsius flavours I like 😂 but nooooo.”
At this stage, the conversation remained peaceful.
Neither party knew that they were about to become involved in one of the most ridiculous beverage-related legal cases in history.
Exhibit B: The Casualty Report
Mima delivered the official inventory update.
Mima:
“66 burkar. Skulle vart 67 men ena offra sitt liv för å rädd dom andra soldaterna”
Translation: “66 cans. There should have been 67, but one sacrificed its life to save the other soldiers.”
The language was concerning.
The defendant had already begun referring to the beverages as soldiers.
The prosecution would later argue that this demonstrated an alarming tendency towards dramatic storytelling.
The defence would argue that the defendant was simply being funny.
Exhibit C: The First Public Reaction
Best Friend:
“HAHAHAHA OFFRADE SITT LIV”
Translation: “HAHAHAHA SACRIFICED ITS LIFE.”
Mima:
“Haha jaa den gjorde de 🫡 en bra soldat!”
Translation: “Haha yeah, it did 🫡 a good soldier!”
The deceased had officially been promoted from energy drink to fallen military hero.
Exhibit D: The Memorial
The best friend acknowledged the deceased.
Best Friend:
“Rest in peace, brave energy drink.”
Mima responded:
“He took one for the team. He sacrificed himself. A brave soldier 🫡”
The prosecution considers these statements deeply suspicious.
The defence considers them a perfectly normal conversation between two people who have apparently lost the plot over a can of energy drink.
The court makes no comment on the latter assessment.
Exhibit E: The Viking Theory
Mima later escalated the situation by describing the incident as a warrior’s death.
Mima:
“Gaaahahahaa jävla militär styrka 😂 en fallen soldat. En viking som dog i strid till stapling”
Translation: “Hahahaha, bloody military strength 😂 a fallen soldier. A Viking who died in battle to stacking.”
At this point, the case had evolved beyond ordinary workplace negligence.
The victim was now a Viking.
The warehouse was a battlefield.
The stacking operation was a military campaign.
And Mima was the warehouse leader nobody had asked for.

───

PART III — THE DEFENDANT
Mima, the Horrible Warehouse Leader
Aliases:
• The Raspberry & Peach Killer
• The Beverage Menace
• The Viking Slayer
• The Horrible Warehouse Leader
• A Danger to Beverages Everywhere
Occupation: Energy drink inventory management.
Known associates: One best friend and 66 surviving cans.
Last known location: Standing over a storage box, attempting to organise beverages.
Motive: Unknown.
Evidence of premeditation: None.
Level of dramatics: Catastrophic.
The defendant maintains that the incident was accidental.
The prosecution remains unconvinced by her subsequent decision to describe the deceased as a brave soldier.

───

PART IV — THE CRIME SCENE
Exhibit B: The Storage Box
The defendant’s own photograph documents the actual storage box containing her energy drink collection.
The image shows the cans stacked together, with the Raspberry & Peach cans visible among the remaining beverages.
The photograph establishes the context of the incident: this was a real storage and stacking operation, not an imaginary warehouse constructed for the purpose of the trial.
The prosecution’s argument:
The defendant was responsible for the warehouse.
The defendant was responsible for stacking.
One beverage was punctured.
The defendant subsequently gave the deceased a military backstory.
The prosecution submits that the final point is particularly disturbing.
Exhibit A: The Victim
One Celsius Sparkling Raspberry Peach.
The victim was intended to be part of the defendant’s treasured stash.
Instead, it became the centrepiece of an international imaginary criminal investigation.
Its final words were never recorded.
Its final hiss, however, was reportedly audible.
Rest in peace, brave energy drink.

───

PART V — THE OFFICIAL CHARGE SHEET
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RASPBERRY & PEACH DIVISION
The People v. Mima
The defendant faces the following fictional charges:
Count I — Involuntary Can-Slaughter
Causing the untimely demise of one Celsius can during routine warehouse operations.
Count II — Criminally Negligent Stacking
Failure to prevent a dangerous entanglement between two beverage cans.
Count III — Abuse of Warehouse Authority
Exercising questionable judgement while managing an inventory of energy drinks.
Count IV — Reckless Endangerment of 66 Innocent Beverages
Exposing the remaining cans to the possibility of further stacking-related incidents.
Count V — Making Light of a Workplace Fatality
Referring to the deceased as a brave soldier, a fallen warrior and a Viking who died in battle.
Count VI — Crimes Against Peach-Kind
An entirely imaginary charge brought by the increasingly dramatic prosecution.
Important legal note: These charges are fictional jokes, not real criminal offences being alleged against Mima.

───

PART VI — THE PROSECUTION’S OPENING STATEMENT
“Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we are gathered here today because one innocent can went to work and never came home.
The defendant, Mima, was entrusted with the simple task of organising a beverage storage facility.
Instead, that facility became a crime scene.
The evidence will show that the victim was punctured during stacking operations, while 66 fellow beverages remain in the defendant’s custody.
And what did the defendant say?
‘A brave soldier.’
Your Honour, the defendant is not only responsible for the stacking operation. She is making jokes about the victim.
We ask the jury to consider whether the remaining beverages are truly safe under her management.”

───

PART VII — THE DEFENCE’S OPENING STATEMENT
“Your Honour, my client pleads not guilty to intentional murder.
This was a tragic workplace accident.
The evidence indicates that the bottom of one can became caught on the pull tab of another during ordinary stacking operations.
There is no evidence of premeditation. There is no evidence that my client deliberately targeted the victim.
Furthermore, the prosecution’s entire case relies heavily on the defendant’s sense of humour.
Describing a beverage as a fallen Viking is not a confession to murder.
We ask the jury to distinguish between an unfortunate accident and an unnecessarily elaborate criminal prosecution.”

───

PART VIII — WITNESS TESTIMONY
Witness 1: The Best Friend
The best friend was informed of the incident and responded with laughter, followed by a memorial message.
Statement:
“Rest in peace, brave energy drink.”
The witness subsequently participated in the ongoing discussion about the deceased’s heroic sacrifice.
The prosecution considers the witness an important source of information.
The defence notes that the witness has provided no evidence of intentional wrongdoing.
Witnesses 2–67: The Remaining Beverages
Collective statement:
“No comment. We fear retaliation.”
The remaining beverages have not provided formal testimony.
Their collective silence is considered suspicious by the prosecution and entirely understandable by the defence.
Witness 68: The Pull Tab
The alleged mechanical participant in the incident.
Statement, as imagined by the court:
“I was simply existing when the incident occurred.”
The pull tab denies any intention to participate in a criminal act.
The court acknowledges that this witness would be difficult to interview.

───

PART IX — EXHIBITS C THROUGH F
Exhibit C — The Pull Tab
The alleged point of entanglement during the stacking incident.
Exhibit D — The Puncture
The physical damage that led to the audible release of pressure.
Exhibit E — The Survivors
The remaining 66 cans, whose continued existence has become a central point of the investigation.
Exhibit F — The Defendant’s Own Words
“He took one for the team. He sacrificed himself. A brave soldier.”
The prosecution considers this statement an extraordinary attempt to romanticise the loss of a beverage.
The defence maintains that it was a joke.

───

PART X — THE CROSS-EXAMINATION
PROSECUTOR: Where were you at the time of the incident?
MIMA: Organising my inventory.
PROSECUTOR: And the victim?
MIMA: He took one for the team.
PROSECUTOR: You describe the deceased as a soldier?
MIMA: A brave soldier.
PROSECUTOR: And a Viking?
MIMA: A Viking who died in battle to stacking.
PROSECUTOR: Your Honour, I have no further questions.
JUDGE: You appear to have run out of questions.
PROSECUTOR: I have run out of patience.
DEFENCE: We move to dismiss all charges on the grounds that this entire situation is ridiculous.
JUDGE: Motion denied. I want to know what happened to the can.

───

PART XI — THE JUDGE’S DELIBERATION
The court has reviewed the evidence, the photographs, the witness statements and the defendant’s own words.
The following facts are established within this fictional case:
• The defendant was organising her energy drink stash.
• A can became caught on another can’s pull tab.
• The incident caused a puncture and an audible hiss.
• The collection went from an intended 67 cans to 66 cans.
• The defendant described the victim as a soldier who sacrificed its life for the others.
• The defendant’s best friend participated in the memorial.
• The deceased has received more public recognition than most energy drinks could ever hope to achieve.
The court finds no evidence of intentional murder.
However, the court considers the defendant’s warehouse management methods worthy of further scrutiny.
The court also notes that the defendant appears to have transformed an ordinary stacking accident into a full-scale criminal investigation.

───

PART XII — THE FINAL VERDICT
THE PEOPLE v. MIMA
Verdict: Guilty of Being Dramatic.
Count I — Involuntary Can-Slaughter
Not guilty of intentional murder.
The court recognises the incident as an accidental puncture during stacking operations.
Count II — Criminally Negligent Stacking
Guilty in the Court of Chaos.
The defendant must review her stacking technique before the next inventory session.
Count III — Abuse of Warehouse Authority
Guilty of Excessive Dramatics.
The defendant is prohibited from referring to herself as a competent warehouse manager until further notice.
Count IV — Reckless Endangerment of 66 Innocent Beverages
Sentence suspended.
The court requires safer stacking procedures.
Count V — Making Light of a Workplace Fatality
Guilty.
The defendant shall issue a formal apology to the surviving beverages.
Count VI — Crimes Against Peach-Kind
Guilty in the court of public opinion.
The prosecution has successfully established that the defendant is a danger to beverages everywhere.

───

PART XIII — SENTENCING
The court hereby orders:
1. The defendant shall issue a formal apology to the surviving 66 cans.
2. The defendant shall implement safer stacking procedures.
3. The deceased shall receive a permanent memorial in the warehouse records.
4. The best friend shall be recognised as an honorary witness to the tragedy.
5. All future can-related incidents must be reported immediately.
6. No further military ranks shall be awarded to beverages without prior authorisation.
The court is adjourned.
May the Raspberry & Peach rest in peace.

───

PART XIV — THE AFTERMATH
At the conclusion of proceedings, Mima returned to the storage facility.
Sixty-six cans remained.
The warehouse was quiet.
The surviving soldiers stood together, awaiting further instructions.
And somewhere in the distance, the warehouse leader could be heard whispering:
“We were supposed to be 67.”
The investigation was officially closed.
The beverages, however, remained on high alert.

───

FINAL CASE SUMMARY
THE PEOPLE v. MIMA
One can was punctured.
Sixty-six survived.
A best friend became a witness.
A pull tab became a person of interest.
A warehouse manager became a wanted suspect.
A stacking accident became a murder trial.
And one innocent Celsius Raspberry Peach became a legend.
CONSIDERED A DANGER TO BEVERAGES EVERYWHERE.
Case closed. Until the next inventory session.

───

Editorial note: This is a fictional comedy case file based on a real, humorous conversation and a reported accidental can puncture. The courtroom, charges, witness testimony beyond the quoted messages, and verdict are fictional. The original Swedish text messages are reproduced where available, with English translations for the blog reader.

The pictures that was used in the court